What it shows
The chart breaks post-cliff recovery into three signals per compound:- Recovery rate (
recovery_flag): the fraction of post-cliff laps where the model flags any partial pace recovery. This runs very high across all compounds (~86–89%) because the flag fires on any positive deviation from the cliff slope, however small. - Average recovery probability: the model’s probabilistic estimate of how likely a lap with the observed surface/bulk load split is to recover. This is far more discriminating than the binary flag typically 21–29%.
- Surface/bulk ratio: the ratio of surface thermal load to bulk mechanical load. Below ~0.4 the wear is bulk-driven (compound breakdown, hard to recover); above ~0.4 it is mixed or surface-driven (thermal, can partially recover with reduced push).
Only post-cliff laps are included the feature is silent about pre-cliff behaviour, which the degradation timeline covers.
How to use it
- Select a compound to see its post-cliff recovery profile.
- Trust the probability over the rate the near-universal recovery rate is a low bar; the average recovery probability is the number that separates compounds.
- Read the surface/bulk ratio to know why a tyre can or cannot recover: a low ratio means structural breakdown that lifting won’t fix.
- Cross-reference a real stint in the pit strategy Gantt to see whether a driver who extended was riding recoverable thermal wear or terminal structural wear.
Reading the signal correctly
A high recovery rate does not mean tyres bounce back to fresh pace it means a measurable, often tiny, deviation above the cliff slope. The magnitude lives in the average recovery probability, not the flag.Data source
The chart queriesint_tyre_surface_vs_bulk_decoupling via DuckDB-Wasm in the browser, using post-cliff laps only.
The data window covers 2018–2024, post-cliff laps only.
For the full model definition, see the
int_tyre_surface_vs_bulk_decoupling reference.